The correct answer is Option 2. Explanation & Key Takeaways: • The 'Bommai Case' judgment was a landmark ruling delivered by the Supreme Court in 1994. It emphasized the federal structure of the Indian Constitution and placed checks on the misuse of Article 356, which allows the imposition of President's Rule in states. • The Supreme Court ruled that states can appeal the imposition of President's Rule to ensure it is not misused arbitrarily. • It was held that if President's Rule is imposed without valid reasons, the Supreme Court can quash the decision of the Central Government. • The judgment also stated that an order to dissolve a State Assembly must receive the approval of the Parliament. Related Concepts: • The case arose after the dismissal of several state governments by the central government, highlighting the need for judicial oversight in such cases. • The judgment clarified that the imposition of President's Rule is subject to judicial review, thus reinforcing the principles of federalism in India. • This landmark ruling continues to serve as a key precedent in cases involving the misuse of Article 356.