The Correct Answer is : Golaknath case Explanation & Key Takeaways: • Case Name: The case is known as 'I.C. Golaknath and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Anrs'. It is commonly referred to as the Golaknath case. • Year of Judgement: The judgement was delivered by the Supreme Court of India on 27th February, 1967. • Bench: The case was heard by an 11-judge bench, which was the largest bench till that time. The judgement was headed by Chief Justice Subba Rao. • Issue of the Case: The issue was whether the Parliament of India could amend any part of the Constitution including fundamental rights of the citizens. • Judgement: In the Golaknath case, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision and stated that Parliament cannot amend the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. The Court handled the concept of 'prospective overruling', according to which the judgement would be effective 'prospectively' and not affect the past amendments. • Impact: The judgement essentially stated that Parliament did not have the power to curtail any of the fundamental rights in the Constitution. This judgement led to much controversy and contributed significantly to the constitutional crisis in India in the late 1960s and 1970s. • 24th Amendment: In response to the judgement, Indira Gandhi's government introduced the 24th Amendment in 1971, asserting and restoring the unlimited amending power of Parliament, leading to further controversies and legal challenges.